An example of such a decision on where to locate may be seen in the purely political decision in the 1990s that the new Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) should reside in Alicante, Spain - instead of the the much better prepared London - since it simply was Spain's turn to receive a major EU institution.
21 October 2011
Will the Unified EU Patent Court be Situated in Munich, or rather Warsaw?
An example of such a decision on where to locate may be seen in the purely political decision in the 1990s that the new Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) should reside in Alicante, Spain - instead of the the much better prepared London - since it simply was Spain's turn to receive a major EU institution.
posted by Volker 'Falk' Metzler on 10/21/2011 0 Comments
Labels: EU Patent Court, Munich, OHIM, Unified Patent Court, Warsaw
08 October 2011
EU Document 14191/11: Compatibility Check of Unified Patent Court Draft against EU Regulations
In the articles titled "Compatibility Of Draft Agreement On Unified Patent Court with EU acquis" on the ksnh::law IP blog, we report that Axel's individual request regarding public access to EU Council Document 14191/11 titled "Compatibility of the draft agreement on the Unified Patent Court with the Union acquis" (download here) has been accepted by the General Secretariat.
The document reveals that the Commission services have checked the compatibility of the draft agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPC) against an number of EU Regulations, Directives and Conventions and found that essentially only the relationship between the Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I) and the UPC Draft needs to be clarified in a particular way.
posted by Volker 'Falk' Metzler on 10/08/2011 0 Comments
Labels: EU law, EU Patent Court, European Patent Law
07 October 2011
Unitary Patent will not Lower Patent Prosecution Costs by the Promised Amounts
In a new article titled "Will the Unitary Patent Really Lower Costs for Applicants by up to 70% ?", the IP law blog ksnh::law reports on the fact that this full-bodied announcement of the President of the EPO, Benoît Battistelli, and the European Commissioner for the Internal Market and Services, Michel Barnier, is not realistic and only political PR language.
In fact, Mr. Battistelli made clear earlier this year that there will be no change of the EPO's overall fee level only for the EU patent, so that significant cost savings can only be expected in the post-grant phase. Consequently, it is not any more desired that patent APPLICANTS profit from the promised cost savings but rather patent PROPRIETORS who decide to enforce their granted patent – i.e. a vanishing minority of all patentees.
posted by Volker 'Falk' Metzler on 10/07/2011 0 Comments
Labels: cost reduction, EU Patent, IP politics, translation, Unitary Patent